Tariffs, Trade, and USMCA Review: Legal and Commercial Insights

Tariffs, Trade, and USMCA Review: Legal and Commercial Insights

The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) has established a new phase for the trade relationship between the United States, Mexico, and Canada. During the Northeast Trade Spotting session organized by the Northeast Chapter of the Foreign Trade & Logistics Committee, Managing Director and Co-Leader of Trade & Customs at Kroll, Nick Baker, presented a detailed analysis of U.S. tariff policy and its implications for business operations within the region.

The U.S. tariff environment has reached levels not seen since 1934. Current measures include tariffs on copper, steel, aluminum, and the automotive industry, with rates reaching up to 50% on raw materials and derivatives. These measures are grounded in the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which is undergoing judicial review. The outcome of these legal proceedings may redefine the scope of presidential authority in trade matters, establishing new parameters that companies will need to integrate into their strategic planning.

In response to measures adopted by the U.S. administration, Mexico and Canada have implemented differentiated strategies. In Mexico’s case, while the possibility of applying tariffs of up to 25% on strategic sectors was announced, the Federal Government chose to prioritize diplomatic channels. Canada, meanwhile, responded immediately with 25% retaliatory tariffs on U.S. products. However, beginning in September, the Canadian Government decided to reduce most of these measures with the objective of facilitating continued bilateral dialogue. These measures, along with modifications to the de minimis threshold for cross-border operations, have generated new customs requirements that affect transit times for goods in the region.

Beyond the political context, these measures have direct implications for business operations. The new tariffs increase the cost of inputs such as metals and automotive components, while changes in customs procedures require additional processing times and greater compliance preparation. In this environment, companies are strengthening origin verification and tariff classification processes, diversifying suppliers, and adjusting budgets to incorporate commercial risk management considerations.

Tariffs implemented under legal frameworks such as the IEEPA introduce new variables in the commercial environment that call for greater adaptability in business planning. While ongoing adjustments to their duration and evolving legal procedures require careful consideration in financing and long-term commitments, they also encourage companies to enhance flexibility and strengthen compliance and logistics strategies. At the regional level, these measures present an opportunity to reconfigure supply chains in ways that reinforce resilience and competitiveness, helping to preserve the USMCA’s role as a platform for growth and innovation across key sectors such as metals, automotive, and agri-food.

While the current measures remain in place, at AMCHAM, we reaffirm our commitment to building bridges of constructive dialogue and contributing with our multisectoral expertise and concrete proposals that support decision-making to strengthen the competitiveness of our region. By working together, the United States, Mexico, and Canada can ensure that North America continues to be a global platform for competitiveness, innovation, and shared prosperity.

AMERICAN CHAMBER/MEXICO
Monterrey, Nuevo León | 01| 09 | 2025

Perspectivas Regionales sobre la Reducción de la Jornada Laboral en Latinoamérica

Perspectivas Regionales sobre la Reducción de la Jornada Laboral en Latinoamérica

La discusión sobre la jornada laboral y los derechos de los colaboradores ha cobrado fuerza en América Latina, donde distintos países han impulsado reformas para mejorar la calidad de vida de los trabajadores, al mismo tiempo que se busca preservar la eficiencia operativa de las empresas. En México, este debate ocurre en un contexto caracterizado por la creciente integración en cadenas globales de valor, la presión competitiva en el sector industrial y la necesidad de mantener la productividad frente a los mercados internacionales.

En una mesa de análisis organizada por AMERICAN CHAMBER/MEXICO Capítulo Noreste, junto con AmCham Chile y AmCham Colombia, especialistas como Iván Mergudich de Aramark; Fernando Arab, abogado laboral y exviceministro del Trabajo en Chile; Carolina Porras de Philippi Prietocarrizosa Ferrero DU & Uría; Francisco Peña, de CCN; Edith González de Banco Base; y Álvaro García, de Prodensa, compartieron sus perspectivas sobre la implementación de estas reformas en sus respectivos países, resaltando experiencias que pueden servir como referencia para México.

La experiencia chilena muestra que la reducción de la jornada laboral se ha implementado en un entorno económico estable y con regulaciones consolidadas, lo que ha permitido ajustes ordenados sin afectar la productividad. En Colombia, el proceso avanza de manera más gradual, acompañado de medidas de apoyo que equilibran la eficiencia empresarial con el bienestar de los colaboradores, atendiendo la diversidad de sectores productivos.

Para México, estos casos subrayan la importancia de evaluar cualquier reforma con una visión integral que considere la competitividad industrial, la carga administrativa y los impactos en empresas con operaciones multinacionales. El intercambio de experiencias regionales brinda un marco de referencia útil para orientar políticas laborales y estrategias de gestión de talento en distintos contextos.

Más allá de las diferencias entre países, el análisis permitió identificar buenas prácticas, generar aprendizajes compartidos y construir una visión comparativa que enriquece la toma de decisiones. Estos insumos fortalecen a las empresas de la región para avanzar hacia un modelo laboral que impulse la productividad, fomente el bienestar de los colaboradores y promueva un desarrollo económico más inclusivo y sostenible.

 

AMERICAN CHAMBER/MEXICO
Monterrey, Nuevo León | (19 | 08 | 2025)